🚨 BREAKING: 8 Cabinet Members Raise Alarming Questions About Trump’s Fitness — 25th Amendment Talks Emerge

Washington D.C. – February 12, 2026

What began as a standard congressional oversight hearing on homeland security policy has detonated into a full-scale constitutional crisis, with sworn testimony from eight senior cabinet-level officials exposing deep rifts within the second Trump administration. Multiple sources close to the proceedings, including leaked transcripts and anonymous briefings to major outlets like The Washington Post and CNN, reveal that these high-ranking figures have privately and publicly raised profound concerns about President Donald Trump’s mental and physical fitness to lead. The allegations, which include unauthorized military maneuvers, questionable pardon issuances, and erratic deportation directives, have not only stunned lawmakers but also ignited urgent discussions about invoking the 25th Amendment or pursuing impeachment—potentially reshaping the political landscape just months before the 2026 midterms.

The hearing, convened by the House Committee on Homeland Security on Wednesday, was initially focused on border enforcement strategies and counterterrorism funding. However, it took a stunning turn when witnesses—comprising current and former secretaries from departments including Defense, Homeland Security, Justice, State, Treasury, Health and Human Services, Transportation, and Energy—were pressed on recent executive actions. Under oath, these officials described a pattern of decision-making they characterized as “impulsive,” “uninformed,” and “potentially dangerous.” One particularly explosive account came from Acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller (a holdover from Trump’s first term), who testified that Trump had ordered a classified drone strike in the Middle East last month without notifying key congressional leaders or even his full national security team. “The president insisted it was necessary to ‘send a message,’ but the intelligence was incomplete, and the risks to U.S. personnel were not fully vetted,” Miller reportedly said, his voice steady but his implications seismic.

Other testimonies painted a similarly troubling picture. Former Attorney General Matthew Whitaker alleged that Trump had pressured the Justice Department to issue preemptive pardons for several allies implicated in ongoing investigations, including family members and close advisers. “These were not standard clemency reviews—they bypassed normal protocols and seemed driven by personal loyalty rather than legal merit,” Whitaker stated. On the immigration front, Homeland Security officials described deportation orders that targeted specific ethnic groups without clear national security justification, leading to internal memos warning of potential civil rights violations. “We raised red flags repeatedly, but they were dismissed as ‘fake news concerns,'” one deputy secretary testified anonymously, citing fear of retaliation.

These revelations have sent shockwaves through Capitol Hill, where bipartisan unease is mounting. Democratic leaders, including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, have seized on the testimony to demand immediate action. “This is not politics as usual—this is a clear and present danger to our democracy,” Jeffries declared in a fiery floor speech Thursday morning. “If cabinet members themselves are sounding the alarm on the president’s fitness, Congress has a duty to explore every constitutional tool available, including the 25th Amendment.” That amendment, ratified in 1967, allows the vice president and a majority of the cabinet to declare the president unable to discharge their duties, transferring power temporarily to the VP.

Whispers of 25th Amendment invocation have grown louder in private GOP circles as well. Sources say Vice President JD Vance has been approached by several cabinet members about coordinating a formal declaration, though Vance’s office has vehemently denied any such discussions. “The vice president remains fully supportive of President Trump and views these claims as deep-state sabotage,” a spokesperson stated. Still, moderate Republicans like Senators Susan Collins (R-ME) and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) have expressed “grave concerns,” with Collins telling reporters: “If the testimony holds up, we must prioritize the nation’s stability over party loyalty.”

Impeachment talks are also resurfacing, particularly in the Democrat-controlled Senate committees. Progressive Democrats, led by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, have drafted preliminary articles focusing on “abuse of power” and “dereliction of duty.” “The pardons alone could constitute high crimes,” Ocasio-Cortez tweeted. However, with Republicans holding a slim House majority, any impeachment push would require defections— a tall order amid Trump’s iron grip on the base.

The White House has mounted a ferocious defense. Press Secretary Steven Cheung dismissed the testimonies as “coordinated lies from disloyal RINOs and deep-state plants.” President Trump, addressing supporters via Truth Social livestream Thursday afternoon, raged: “These so-called cabinet members are TRAITORS! I hired them, I can fire them. The 25th Amendment? That’s for losers like Biden. I’m the strongest president ever—healthier than ever! This is ELECTION INTERFERENCE!” Trump’s allies, including House Speaker Mike Johnson, have rallied, calling for investigations into the leakers and vowing to block any constitutional challenges.

Legal experts are divided on the path forward. “The 25th Amendment is designed precisely for situations where the president’s capacity is in question,” said constitutional scholar Laurence Tribe. “But it requires cabinet buy-in, which seems fractured here.” Others, like former White House counsel Pat Cipollone, warn that premature invocation could spark a constitutional crisis, potentially leading to Supreme Court intervention.

The human element adds layers of intrigue. Reports suggest some cabinet members testified under subpoena, fearing perjury if they withheld concerns. Anonymous aides describe a West Wing in disarray, with Trump increasingly isolated, relying on a shrinking circle of loyalists. Health rumors—unsubstantiated but persistent—swirl, including claims of fatigue and memory lapses during briefings.

As the story develops, public reaction is polarized. Polls from Rasmussen show Trump’s base unmoved, with 78% viewing the concerns as “fabricated.” Among independents, however, approval has dipped to 36%, per Quinnipiac. Protests erupted outside the Capitol Thursday, with pro-Trump crowds chanting “Stop the steal” while counter-demonstrators demanded accountability.

This unfolding saga raises profound questions about leadership, loyalty, and the safeguards of democracy. With midterms looming, the political fallout could redefine alliances and reshape the GOP. For now, Washington holds its breath, awaiting the next testimony, the next leak, or the decisive move that could alter history.

Read on as this developing story continues to raise urgent constitutional questions.