On a recent evening, Jimmy Kimmel opened his monologue with a familiar target: Donald Trump. The president, he noted, had dismissed him as “not a talented person” with “very bad ratings,” comments Mr. Trump has made in various forms over the years. But the sharper focus of Mr. Kimmel’s segment was not the president himself. It was his eldest son, Donald Trump Jr..

What followed was less a single punchline than a continuation of a long-running late-night narrative — one that has steadily reframed Mr. Trump Jr. from political surrogate to recurring comic character.

The immediate backdrop was a weekend of high-profile appearances by the president, including an address at the World Economic Forum in Davos. Mr. Trump’s speech, wide-ranging and at times improvisational, touched on trade, foreign policy and domestic construction projects, including plans for a new ballroom at the White House. Supporters described the remarks as characteristic bluntness; critics called them rambling. For late-night hosts, they provided ample material.

Yet Mr. Kimmel’s sharper barbs were reserved for Mr. Trump Jr., who has increasingly positioned himself as a public defender of his father’s agenda. In clips replayed during the broadcast, Mr. Trump Jr. praised the enthusiastic receptions he and his father received at political events, describing rallies as “electric.” Mr. Kimmel juxtaposed those comments with jokes suggesting a son eager for approval and perpetually in his father’s shadow.

The dynamic is not new. For years, Mr. Kimmel and other hosts have returned to Mr. Trump Jr.’s social media posts, interviews and public appearances as reliable fodder. Engagement announcements, political commentary and even hunting photographs have been reframed as evidence of privilege or performative populism. Each joke builds on the last, creating a cumulative portrait that is difficult to separate from the public persona itself.

Mr. Trump Jr., an executive vice president of the Trump Organization, has embraced a combative online presence, frequently criticizing political opponents and media figures. His defenders argue that he is a forceful advocate for policies he believes in and a key conduit to grassroots supporters. Critics contend that his outspokenness often outpaces his command of detail, making him vulnerable to satire.

Late-night comedy has long shaped political perception, from the caricatures of Gerald Ford in the 1970s to the impersonations of Sarah Palin in the 2000s. But the relationship between satire and politics has intensified in the Trump era, with monologues routinely ricocheting into the next day’s news cycle. In this instance, Mr. Trump responded publicly, reiterating his criticism of Mr. Kimmel and suggesting the host’s program deserved cancellation — a claim not supported by any announcement from ABC, which airs Jimmy Kimmel Live!.

The president’s remarks only amplified the segment’s reach. Media scholars note that when political figures engage directly with comedians, they elevate entertainment into the realm of formal political discourse. “It’s a feedback loop,” said Amanda Reyes, a professor of media studies at New York University. “The satire provokes a response, and the response validates the satire as politically significant.”

Family dynamics have also become part of the narrative. Mr. Kimmel has frequently alluded to what he portrays as a competitive or approval-seeking relationship between father and son, suggesting that Mr. Trump Jr.’s public performances are attempts to demonstrate loyalty. While such interpretations are speculative, they resonate with audiences familiar with the president’s emphasis on branding and dominance.

Recent developments in Mr. Trump Jr.’s personal life have added to the attention. News reports about changes in his engagement status and his former fiancée’s diplomatic appointment — Kimberly Guilfoyle was nominated as ambassador to Greece — became additional material for comedians. Mr. Kimmel suggested, jokingly, that the appointment was a convenient way to create distance. Administration officials have described the nomination as recognition of Ms. Guilfoyle’s advocacy and political work.

Beyond the humor lies a broader question about the role of satire in democratic accountability. Mr. Kimmel framed his critique as more than entertainment, arguing that repeated patterns of exaggeration or inconsistency deserve scrutiny. By revisiting earlier statements and controversies, he constructs a narrative arc that suggests continuity rather than isolated missteps.

Whether that narrative alters public opinion is uncertain. Research on political comedy suggests it can reinforce existing views more than it changes them. Supporters of the Trump family often dismiss late-night hosts as partisan commentators, while critics view the jokes as distilled truth.

Still, the persistence of the focus is notable. In a media environment saturated with rapid-fire controversies, few story lines endure. The portrayal of Mr. Trump Jr. as privileged, reactive and eager for validation has become a staple of one of television’s most-watched late-night programs.

For the Trump family, accustomed to dominating headlines, the attention is both asset and liability. Visibility sustains influence, but it also invites scrutiny. Each rally speech, social media post or televised interview carries the possibility of becoming the next monologue.

In the end, the exchange underscores a defining feature of contemporary politics: the merging of spectacle and governance. A speech in Davos can segue into a late-night punchline; a joke delivered to laughter can prompt a presidential retort. As long as both sides continue to engage, the cycle shows little sign of slowing — a running dialogue between power and parody, played out one monologue at a time.