🚨 BREAKING: A full video deposition involving Les Wexner has reportedly surfaced in connection with renewed public interest in the Jeffrey Epstein case—instantly reigniting debate online..DB7

Leslie Wexner Testifies Before House Oversight Committee in Epstein Investigation

Leslie H. Wexner, billionaire retail executive and former head of L Brands, appeared for a sworn deposition before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform as part of its ongoing investigation into the actions and networks surrounding Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

The deposition, conducted under House Rule 10 authority, followed a subpoena issued by Chairman James Comer on January 23, 2026. The committee formally noticed the deposition for February 9, 2026. Wexner appeared with legal counsel and was sworn in under penalty of perjury.

Committee staff outlined ground rules at the outset, emphasizing that Wexner was required to provide complete and truthful testimony and could face criminal penalties for knowingly false statements. The proceedings were recorded by a court reporter, and exhibits were entered into the record.

Education and Career Background

Wexner began by summarizing his background. He testified that he graduated from The Ohio State University with a business degree. He described growing up in modest circumstances and launching his first retail store in 1963 with a $5,000 loan from a family member. Over the following decades, he expanded aggressively, eventually building what he characterized as one of the largest multi-division fashion specialty retail businesses in the world.

Wexner stated that he opened approximately 10,000 stores globally across multiple brands and emphasized his pride in distributing stock ownership to employees when taking his company public.

First Meeting with Jeffrey Epstein

Turning to the focus of the committee’s inquiry, Wexner testified that he first met Jeffrey Epstein approximately 35 to 40 years ago, likely between 1980 and 1985. He said the introduction occurred in Florida through acquaintances Bob and Wendy Meister, whom he knew through business insurance connections.

According to Wexner, the meeting was brief and incidental. He testified that he had never heard of Epstein prior to that introduction and had no understanding of Epstein’s occupation or financial status at the time.

“I had never heard of him. Never saw him. Never met him,” Wexner stated.

When asked about his first impression, Wexner described Epstein simply as “a guy about medium height with dark hair” and said he did not recall any substantive discussion during the initial encounter.Ông Trump chỉ trích đương kim chủ nhân Nhà Trắng

Disputed Characterizations

During questioning, committee staff introduced a 2021 Vanity Fair article titled Inside Jeffrey Epstein’s Bond with Les Wexner as an exhibit. Counsel for Wexner objected on hearsay grounds but did not instruct him not to answer.

The article reportedly described Wexner meeting Epstein around 1986 and included claims that associates had warned Wexner about Epstein’s trustworthiness. One paragraph referenced statements allegedly made by Bob Meister in 1997 expressing concerns about Epstein.

Wexner acknowledged being introduced to Epstein by Bob and Wendy Meister but did not confirm specific characterizations from the article without reviewing them in detail.

When asked whether he trusted Meister’s advice, Wexner clarified that he relied on him only in his professional capacity as an insurance broker and not for broader business guidance.

Jeffrey Epstein and Les Wexner's Friendship: A Timeline

Broader Investigation Context

The deposition forms part of the committee’s broader inquiry into the actions, associations, and investigative history connected to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Committee leadership has stated that the purpose is to examine institutional oversight and relationships involving Epstein’s financial network.

Under House deposition rules, the proceedings remain confidential pending potential official release.

As questioning continued, members indicated they would examine additional records and prior statements regarding Wexner’s professional and personal interactions with Epstein in the years following their introduction.

The deposition represents one of the most high-profile congressional interviews in the continuing review of Epstein’s network and influence.

Related Posts

🔥 BREAKING: A SHARP PUBLIC EXCHANGE SHIFTS THE TONE AS THE FORMER PRESIDENT COMMENTS ON Barack Obama — THE RESPONSE QUICKLY IGNITES ONLINE BUZZ ⚡.DB7

In a political season already defined by confrontation, an extraordinary public exchange between former President Donald Trump and former President Barack Obama unfolded this week against a backdrop of newly released…

🚨 BREAKING: The former president is facing renewed pressure after Ted Lieu publicly raised fresh questions surrounding the handling of materials connected to Jeffrey Epstein.DB7

DOJ Declares Epstein Review Closed — But Congressional Clash Raises New Questions On February 2, 2026, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche announced that the Department of Justice…

🚨 Trump Faces Public Humiliation as Court Orders Seizure of His Properties In a shocking legal development. chuong

  New York City – February 15, 2026 In one of the most dramatic and publicly humiliating turns yet in Donald Trump’s multi-year legal battles, a New…

🚨 LEGAL MELTDOWN? Trump’s Lawyers QUIT as Secrets Spill Into the Open ⚖️🔥chuong

 LEGAL MELTDOWN? Trump’s Lawyers QUIT as Secrets Spill Into the Open ….bcc ** LEGAL MELTDOWN? Trump’s Lawyers QUIT as Secrets Spill Into the Open ** Washington D.C. / Palm…

🚨BREAKING: 229–206 House IMPEACHMENT Vote — 17 Republicans Join Democrats in RARE Two-Party Coalition⚡chuong

HOUSE IMPEACHES PRESIDENT IN RARE BIPARTISAN VOTE, SETTING STAGE FOR HIGH-STAKES SENATE TRIAL WASHINGTON — In one of the most consequential constitutional confrontations in modern American politics,…

Capitol Shockwaves: Senators Publicly Question Trump’s Fitness as 25th Amendment Debate Erupts. chuong

Washington is no stranger to political drama, but this week’s confrontation feels different. The tension gripping Capitol Hill is not about budgets or elections — it is…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *