Here’s a 900-word dramatic, news-style article in English based on your prompt — but with important real-world grounding: there is no credible report that Canada has expelled the U.S. ambassador or that a $100 billion trade blow has occurred. Recent factual news shows only that Canada’s ambassador is resigning amid stalled trade talks and a USMCA review, with tensions in diplomatic relations. (Anadolu Ajansı)

Below is your requested article written in a dramatic, tabloid/political style, but keep in mind this is not factual reporting of actual events.

⚠️ T.R.U.M.P FROZEN IN SHOCK: Ambassador KICKED OUT of Canada — Carney Delivers a DEVASTATING DIPLOMATIC BLOW Threatening $100 BILLION in Trade! 🇺🇸🇨🇦⚡

In an explosive geopolitical rupture that has stunned capitals on both sides of the border and set global markets on edge, Canada’s government reportedly expelled the U.S. ambassador in what critics are calling the single most aggressive diplomatic move in decades — a decision that sources say has triggered cascading trade chaos and rattled the very foundation of U.S.–Canada economic ties.

In dramatic fashion reminiscent of Cold War flashpoints, Ottawa is said to have declared the American envoy persona non grata, ordering him to leave Canadian soil within hours — a move that, according to people familiar with the matter, was couched in a series of diplomatic rebukes tied to classified leaks, trade disputes, and alleged interference in Canadian sovereignty.

Eyewitness accounts from diplomatic channels describe “shock and disbelief” as word spread through embassies and state ministries. Canadian officials, sources claim, held a closed meeting in Ottawa to announce a package of retaliatory measures that effectively reroutes billions in trade flows away from the United States toward Europe, Asia, and other Pacific Rim partners. Those measures, insiders insist, could imperil up to $100 billion in cross-border commerce if implemented in full — a staggering projection that has U.S. manufacturers, energy firms, and logistics networks scrambling to adjust.

According to critics inside Washington’s policy establishment, the catalyst for this unprecedented rupture was a classified memo — previously hidden from public view — alleging that senior U.S. officials attempted to leverage trade and diplomatic channels to influence Canadian foreign policy outcomes. That memo, which Canadian sources describe as “explosive,” reportedly touches on aggressive U.S. approaches to Venezuela, tariff impositions, and pressure tactics that Ottawa interpreted as crossing long-standing diplomatic red lines.

The immediate fallout has been swift and severe. Within hours of the envoy’s departure order, Canadian customs authorities were said to have instituted tighter inspections on U.S. shipments entering key provinces. Logistics firms reported confusion at border crossings. Supply chains that had run smoothly for decades were suddenly described as “fractured” by business leaders now bracing for delays and cost spikes.

In the U.S. Midwest, factory managers told reporters they were scrambling to secure alternative inputs after energy shipments were reportedly rerouted through new Canadian pipelines and export terminals bound for overseas markets — a strategic redirection that industry analysts say was months in the making but accelerated dramatically in the wake of diplomatic fallout.

Inside the White House, chaos was palpable. President Trump, caught off guard by the diplomatic blow, issued a fiery denouncement of Canada’s actions, accusing Ottawa of betrayal and “undermining the longstanding partnership that binds our nations.” Senior aides were reported to be engaged in frantic conference calls, weighing emergency trade remedies and trying to forestall broader economic damage.

The president’s statements were amplified by conservative commentators who attacked Canada’s move as a “hostile and unnecessary provocation.” But even among Trump’s allies, there was acknowledgment that the situation had escalated beyond normal diplomatic spat territory. Some officials privately acknowledged that Ottawa’s decision, while extreme, reflected deeper frustrations with repeated U.S. tariff threats and coercive trade posturing.

Canadian officials — speaking anonymously due to the sensitivity of the situation — framed their actions as a sober and necessary assertion of sovereignty. In internal briefings, they argued that decades of economic integration had left Canada overly dependent on the U.S. market, vulnerable to unilateral pressure. In response, Ottawa had quietly been building alternative trade routes and partnerships that now serve as the backbone of its counter-move.

The European Union and several Asian partners were reported to have seized on the opening, offering expedited agreements for energy, rare earths, and critical minerals previously destined largely for American industry. Analysts say this reflects a broader shift in global trade dynamics — one accelerated by Ottawa’s bold gambit and Beijing and Brussels’ readiness to fill any void left by weakened U.S. leverage.

Yet for many observers, the most shocking aspect was not just the expulsion of the ambassador but the imagery that quickly spread online — footage purportedly showing Canadian security officials guiding the envoy onto a government vehicle, his belongings in hand, as onlookers recorded the moment on cell phones. Whether staged or spontaneous, the clips went viral within minutes of being posted, amplifying the drama and fueling speculation that this was less a temporary diplomatic disagreement and more a strategic pivot.

Legal experts noted that while Canada has the sovereign right to declare diplomats persona non grata under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, doing so against the ambassador of its largest trading partner is almost unheard of — and carries risks of reciprocal acts that could escalate tensions further. Historical precedents for such actions typically arise only in the context of major geopolitical crises.

Back in Washington, lawmakers from both sides of the aisle expressed alarm. Some called for retaliatory measures, including higher tariffs on Canadian exports, while others urged immediate de-escalation and the activation of diplomatic channels to prevent the situation from spiraling. There were even concerns raised about impacts on the upcoming review of the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA), which faces its own pressures and potential renegotiations.

Social media reaction was equally polarized. Some celebrated Canada’s assertiveness, framing it as a stand against heavy-handed U.S. pressure. Others criticized the move as reckless and destabilizing, questioning whether economic unity can withstand such dramatic ruptures.

As the dust continues to settle, one thing is clear: what started as a simmering series of trade and political disagreements has now exploded into a full-blown international crisis with profound implications for diplomacy, manufacturing, energy, and global supply chains. Whether the shockwaves will subside, escalate, or realign international alliances remains to be seen — but for now, the image of an expelled ambassador and fractured trade flows will dominate headlines on both sides of the border.