Al Green Pushes Trump Impeachment as Constitutional Crisis Deepens

The word impeachment has once again entered the spotlight as Representative Al Green of Texas renewed his call to remove Donald J. Trump from office, accusing the president of abusing executive power and endangering democratic institutions.

Speaking on the House floor, Green stated he has formally called for Trump’s impeachment, citing conduct he says includes threats against members of Congress, attacks on the judiciary, and unilateral actions that bypass constitutional limits. While impeachment has hovered over Trump’s presidency for months, Green has emerged as the most persistent voice forcing Congress to confront the issue directly.

Why Al Green Keeps Forcing Impeachment Votes

Despite repeated failures, Green continues to introduce impeachment resolutions, arguing that constitutional duty outweighs political convenience. His latest efforts accuse Trump of multiple high crimes, including:

• Ordering military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities without congressional authorization

• Usurping Congress’s power of the purse by spending unapproved funds

• Inciting threats and intimidation through inflammatory Truth Social posts targeting political opponents

These allegations strike at core constitutional principles: war powers, separation of powers, and congressional oversight.

What the Votes Reveal

While Green’s resolutions have been tabled, the vote counts tell a deeper story. Nearly 100 House members voted against tabling one resolution, and some Democratic leaders chose to vote “present,” signaling frustration with leadership’s cautious approach rather than full rejection of Green’s concerns.

These votes create a public record—one that could matter in future elections and historical assessments of how Congress responded to alleged executive overreach.

A Presidency Under Pressure on Multiple Fronts

Green’s impeachment push does not exist in isolation. It comes as the Trump administration faces:

• Court rulings blocking deportations and executive orders

• Legal challenges to tariff authority

• Ongoing fallout from Epstein-related file releases

• Internal GOP fractures and high-profile political defections

Together, these pressures reinforce a growing narrative of an administration struggling with legality, credibility, and institutional limits.

The Bigger Picture

Impeachment may not succeed under current political math, but Green’s campaign serves a broader purpose: keeping constitutional accountability in the public conversation. By forcing votes, he compels lawmakers to take positions that voters—and history—will remember.

As the 2026 midterms approach, these impeachment efforts add to the perception of a presidency under sustained legal and political strain, even without formal removal from office.

Bottom line: Al Green’s impeachment drive is less about immediate success and more about drawing a clear line—arguing that unchecked presidential power should never become normal, regardless of party or politics.